May 8, 2008

Madinah to Host International Knowledge Forum in June

P.K. Abdul Ghafour, Arab News

JEDDAH, 8 May 2008 - The Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (SAGIA) yesterday announced its plan to hold an annual international knowledge forum in Madinah on June 22-24.

SAGIA Gov. Amr Al-Dabbagh said the forum, named Noor (light) and which is the first of its kind, would bring together a large number of intellectuals, scientists, investors and business leaders, adding that it would focus on health and information technology.

More than 100 Muslim investors and intellectuals have agreed to take part in the event. “We want to organize this forum annually as part of SAGIA’s strategy to attract investments in knowledge-based industries,” Al-Dabbagh said.

Please click here to visit the NOOR Madinah Conference website.

Madinah Gov. Prince Abdul Aziz ibn Majed said the three-day forum would contribute to modernizing the Saudi economy. “There are a lot of investment opportunities in knowledge-based industries,” the prince said, adding it will! be held in cooperation with the Knowledge Economic City (KEC) in Madi nah. “KEC will become a base for economic development and a cultural monument for the people and visitors of Madinah,” the governor said.

Dr. Salim Al-Malik, chairman of the forum’s scientific committee, spoke highly of the KEC, which was launched by Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah in June 2006. “KEC will make Madinah the capital of knowledge and the center for scholars as it was during the time of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him),” he pointed out.

Reputable international organizations and institutions including Harvard University, the Association of Muslim Scientists in the US and the Islamic Foundation from the UK will attend the forum. “We hope it will be a good beginning for the Islamic world to restore its leading position in knowledge and science,” Al-Malik said. [more]

Please click here to read more about this article.

May 7, 2008

Prince Alwaleed bin Talal: #89 in TIME Magazine’s 2008 Top 100 People in the World

By Riz Khan

As people run around screaming about a clash of civilizations, it is reassuring to spend time with Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz al-Saud. He crosses boundaries in a unique way, proudly emphasizing his role as the largest individual foreign investor in the U.S. and mingling with power brokers from business, politics and even entertainment, in the East and the West. The Arab world needs people like him who show that good business can unite the most diverse of cultures and nations. In the mid-’90s, he bailed out Citibank when no one else would step in—including Americans. He has openly condemned terrorism and pushed for reform at home in Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Middle East—although he points out with a wry smile that modernization does not have to equal Westernization. The Arab world, he believes, can find a balance that moves it forward without compromising traditions and culture. [more]

Please click here to read more about him.

May 7, 2008

Madeeha Hasan Odhaib: #32 among TIME Magazine’s 2008 Top 100 People in the World

By Queen Rania
It’s not every day that success stories echo out of Iraq into the halls of power, but Madeeha Hasan Odhaib defies the norm. Armed with her sewing machine, unflinching stoicism and determination, Madeeha, 37, is mending the fabric of Iraq.

Four years ago, this mother of two and seamstress turned district council member took three sewing machines, leveraged them into 60 and built a business sewing hospital sheets and flags. She now employs 100 women. That figure may seem insignificant compared with the accomplishments of other achievers on TIME’s list. But in a country with more than 60% unemployment and rampant poverty, such efforts provide a lifeline. [more]

Please click here to read more about her.

May 7, 2008

Anwar Ibrahim: #9 Among TIME Magazine’s Top 100 People in the World in 2008

Paul Wolfowitz

During the 1990s, Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and a group of U.S. Senators organized a forum to exchange views among East Asians and Americans. Asked at one session about the role of Islam in politics, Anwar replied, “I have no use for governments which call themselves Islamic and then deny basic rights to half their population.”

This devout Muslim leader was an impressive and eloquent advocate of tolerance, democracy and human rights. So we were shocked by his arrest and trial in 1998 on charges of corruption and sodomy. I felt his real “crime” had been to challenge Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, whose impressive record will be forever stained by his treatment of Anwar. [more]

Please click here to read the article from TIME.

May 7, 2008

Demonization of Islam in France: Violation of Human Rights

Islamophobia in France: The Law against Hijab

Islamophobia in France: Double Standards for Muslims and Jews

De Villiers: Submitting Islam to French Law

In France, Islamophobia is viewed differently from Antisemitism

Hijab ban in French schools

PARIS — A French law banning hijab in state schools has deepened the Muslim isolation from the broader community, experts said Saturday, September 16.

“Some (Muslims) are enrolled in informal parallel structures. That makes them even more isolated from the broader community,” said Samy Debah, spokesman for the anti-Islamophobia group CCIF, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).

France has triggered a controversy in 2004 by adopting a bill banning hijab and religious insignia in state schools.

French Muslims — a sizeable six-million minority — along with practicing Jews, Sikhs and international human rights groups strongly condemned the law, saying it violated the freedom of religion right in secular France.

In the same year, some 30 girls under the age of 16 dropped out of the French school system altogether, said Nora Rami spokeswoman for a committee opposing the law.

She said the number, though is tiny compared to the hundreds o thousands of Muslims in French schools, has a major significance.

It illustrates a “break between some young Muslim women and a country where “they no longer feel at home,” she said.

Other young Muslim women have also either left to study abroad, including in Belgium, or have signed up for distance learning courses, Rami added.

Islam sees hijab as an obligatory code of dress, not a religious symbol displaying one’s affiliations. [more] Please click here to read the whole article.

Sarkozy in full throttle against hijab in french schools

Paris mosque plastered with graffiti: “France is white”

By The Associated Press
Last update - 21:23 03/07/2006

Vandals painted swastikas and anti-Muslim slogans on a mosque in the Parisian suburb of Courcouronnes, a mosque official said Monday.

Abderrahmane Ammari said “extremists” attacked the walls of the mosque early Sunday, covering the exterior walls with slogans including “Islam go home,” “France is white” and “We fight against Islam” early Sunday morning.

He said this was the second time in a little more than a year that vandals damaged the mosque of Evry-Courcouronne, located in a heavily immigrant town some 25 kilometers south of Paris. [more]

Please click here to read the whole article.

New French Law Legitimizes Islamophobia in France

The new school term in France is the first under the new law which bans Muslim girls from wearing a Muslim headscarf to school. The vast majority of the young women involved (in general between fourteen and eighteen years old) have agreed under duress to remove the headscarf in school. The hundred or so who have refused have been separated from their fellow-pupils and kept in a separate room (often with separate break-times, no right to use the library and no attention from teachers, despite the legal obligation to provide teaching). Over the next three weeks they will be called to disciplinary committees and expelled from schools. They will join an unspecified number who have been too intimidated to turn up at school since the passage of the law.

Stop Press :
In a series of schools around Paris, headmistresses and headmasters (primary and nursery schools) have received strict instructions not to allow Mothers with headscarves to accompany school visits to museums, zoos etc. The One school for everybody committee is planning a demonstration Saturday, and also is planning with a good hope of success to challenge the ruling in the courts.

Some organized opposition to the law has been seen - school students have demonstrated in solidarity in Strasbourg and in the Paris suburbs, but the widespread Right-wing-Left-wing consensus in support of the law has made resistance difficult to organize. Nevertheless public meetings have drawn up to a hundred and fifty people a time, and showings of a new film « Thinly-veiled racism » containing long interviews of Muslim women about their experiences at school are drawing good audiences when shown at community centers around the country.

The existence of the law is encouraging Islamophobia everywhere in France. Over the last few months there have been cases ranging far beyond schools. A bank has refused to serve women in headscarves, a doctor has refused to treat them. Social workers, a health and safety inspector and even a fruit and vegetable saleswoman have been sacked for wearing the headscarf. Mayors have refused to marry women, mothers wearing the headscarf have been turned away at the school gates when bringing their children to school. The demonization of Muslims since September 2001, allied with the high level of racism in France all too happy to become respectable as « Not against Arabs but against Islam » is the main explanation for all this, but the French situation is quite specific, and there are other elements which can be difficult to understand. [more]

30-year old Prayer Room Closed Down

May 7, 2008

United States Seeks to Avoid Linking Islam with Terrorism

U.S. aims to unlink Islamic, terrorism
May 7, 2008

UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL - U.S. officials are being advised in internal government documents to avoid referring publicly to al Qaeda and other terrorist groups as Islamic or Muslim, and not to use terms like jihad or mujahedeen, which “unintentionally legitimize” terrorism.

“There’s a growing consensus [in the Bush administration] that we need to move away from that language,” said a former senior administration official who was involved until recently in policy debates on the issue.

Instead, in two documents circulated last month by the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), the multiagency center charged with strategic coordination of the U.S. war on terror, officials are urged to use terms such as violent extremists, totalitarian and death cult to characterize al Qaeda and other terrorist groups.

“Avoid labeling everything ‘Muslim.’ It reinforces the ‘U.S. vs. Islam’ framework that al Qaeda promotes,” according to “Words that Work and Words that Don’t: A Guide for Counter-Terrorism Communication,” produced last month by the center.

“You have a large percentage of the world’s population that subscribes to this religion,” the former official said. “Unintentionally alienating them is not a judicious move.”

The documents, first reported by the Associated Press, were posted online last week by the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

They highlight developments in the Bush administration’ s strategy for its war on terror that have been fiercely criticized by some who have been its closest allies on the issue, and apparently are being ignored by the presumptive Republican Party presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

Some commentators noted after President Bush’ s State of the Union speech in January that Mr. McCain had stopped using the term Islamic terrorism, instead referring — as the NCTC guide recommends — to “terrorists and extremists — evil men who despise freedom, despise America, and aim to subject millions to their violent rule.”

But in a recent interview with The Washington Times, a McCain aide said the senator would continue to use the term Islamic terrorism.

Daniel Sutherland, who runs the Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, insisted that the avoidance of the term Islam in conjunction with terrorism “is in no way an exercise in political correctness. … We are not watering down what we say.” [more]

Please click here to read the whole article now.

Other articles of interest:

1. A Message of Peace from Muslim Scholars to the Pope.

2. Please click here to download the whole 29-page letter entitled “A Common Word Between Us and You.”

3. Against Terrorism and Religious Extremism: Muslim Position and Responsibilities. An extremely helpful and clearly written handout by the Islamic Society of North America addressed to both Muslims and non-Muslims.

4. Brochure Anti-Terrorisme et Anti-extrémisme en langue française. Une brochure extrêmement utile et clairement écrite par la Société Islamique de l’Amérique du Nord (ISNA) adressée aux Musulmans et aux non-Musulmans francophones du monde entier.

5. Full text of fatwa by Islamic Commission of Spain against Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaida (in English, French and the original Spanish).

6. Complete text of the British Muslim Clerics’ Fatwa against terrorism.

7. Complete text of fatwa of U.S. Muslim Scholars against religious extremism.

May 3, 2008

U.S. Threatened to Attack Saudi Arabia During 1973 Oil Embargo

Bader Alkhorayef
Arab News

RIYADH, 4 May 2008 — The United States threatened to use force against Saudi Arabia in 1973 after King Faisal, along with other Arab leaders, imposed an oil embargo on countries that supported Israel during the October War, Prince Turki Al-Faisal, former intelligence chief and ambassador to Washington, said in an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat yesterday.

In the interview, that appeared ahead of a scientific seminar on King Faisal to be opened by Riyadh Gov. Prince Salman on Tuesday, Prince Turki shed light on important events that took place during his father’s rule.

Prince Turki, who was an adviser at the Royal Court in 1973 when King Faisal took the oil-embargo decision, said the king was not shaken by the US threat and stood firm.

He added that the oil embargo was instrumental in encouraging the US to find a quick and just solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. “King Faisal and other Arab leaders were forced to take the decision as a result of America’s unprecedented support for Israel during the war,” the prince said. He added that American officials talked about the possibility of attacking Saudi oil fields, something that was leaked in US newspapers. Some of these statements came from the then US State Secretary Henry Kissinger.

Prince Turki said King Faisal, who was in Jeddah at the time, received a telegram from Kissinger warning that if the Kingdom did not lift the embargo, the US would take all measures to protect its interests.

“The message was not specific about the measures they were going to take, but it appeared that they would use force. A CIA representative gave me the unsigned message, telling me it was from Kissinger… I went to the king and conveyed its contents. He received the message, read it and said: ‘Kheir insha Allah (Good, God willing).’

“It was very clear that it had come from the American government… The king was very relaxed, cheerful, humorous and was in good spirits despite the threat… This reflected his high quality and determination. He was giving the message that the Kingdom would not bow down to a threat, as a result of a decision it had taken with other Arab countries. It was a great reply,” said Prince Turki. [more]

Please click here to read the whole article from Arab News.

A Short Film About King Faisal

May 3, 2008

Emirates Islamic Bank announces 253% growth in first quarter profits

Emirates Islamic Bank, one of the leading financial institutions in the region announced the first quarter results which were even more impressive when compared to an already impeccable record of results and customer experience.

The Bank recorded a net profit of Dhs148.6m, recording a phenomenal increase of 253 % on the results for the same period last year. The total income in the first quarter of 2008 grew to Dhs359.2m from Dhs189.5m in the same period last year witnessing an increase of 90%.

The bank’s balance sheet including total Assets, Customer deposits and Shareholder equity also recorded significant increases. Compared to the 1st quarter of 2007, total Assets reached Dhs21.15bn reflecting a 68 % growth, Customer deposits grew to Dhs18.15bn registering 68 % growth with total shareholder equity reaching Dhs1.48bn, recording an increase of 31 %. Earnings per share stood at Dhs0.2 reflecting a growth of 257%. [more]

Please click here to read the remainder of the article.

May 3, 2008

China looks at Malaysia to develop halal industry

By JACK WONG, the star, Malaysia,

KUCHING: China, which has more than 18 million Muslims, is looking to Malaysian companies for collaboration to develop its halal food and consumer goods industries.

Vice-Consul (Economic and Commercial) of the China Consulate in Kuching Ma Yu said the Chinese Government had provided preferential policies and financial support to foreign investors in the development of the halal food and consumer goods industries in the country’s western region.

”It has set up a halal food and goods industrial base in Ningxia,” he added in a paper presented at a ”Business opportunities in China” at Kuching Hilton on Wednesday.

The event was jointly organised by the Malaysia External Trade Development Corp (Matrade) and Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) Sarawak.

Ma said Malaysian and Saudi Arabian business delegations had taken part in the annual halal food and goods exhibition in Xining, capital city of Qinghai Province, last year.

He hoped that more Malaysian companies could participate in this year’s expo in September.
[more]

Please click here to read the whole article.

April 29, 2008

U.S. Congressman Ellison questions FBI’s Mueller about treatment of U.S. Muslims

From a House Hearing held Wednesday. The full exchange is pasted below:

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOLDS A HEARING ON OVERSIGHT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

APRIL 23, 2008

Key Lines:
1) MUSLIMS DO ASSIST LAW ENFORCEMENT
Mueller: “And every opportunity I have, I re-affirm the fact that 99.9 percent of Muslim-Americans or Sikh-Americans, Arab-Americans are every bit as patriotic as anybody else in this room, and that many of our cases are a result of the cooperation from the Muslim community in the United States.”

2) MUELLER TAKES ELLISON’S POINT THAT PUBLIC UCC DESIGNATIONS HURT LAW ENFORCEMENTS OUTREACH, COOPERATION AND TRUST-BUILDING EFFORTS
ELLISON: That allows me to go on and ask my question. By naming all these 306 individuals and organizations as unindicted co- conspirators, naming them explicitly, what impact did that have on your effort to build better relations in the Muslim-American community?

MUELLER: I’m not certain it had any impact.

ELLISON: I mean, do you…

MUELLER: I have not heard about an adverse impact as a result of that particular case.

ELLISON: OK. Well, let me ask you this. I mean, there are groups on — the groups that were named in there, there was no verdict against them, because they were unindicted, right?

I mean, do you think — what kind of effect do you think — message it sends to them, in terms of your ability to reach out to the community, gain cooperation, gain trust? Don’t you think it might have a deleterious effect? Doesn’t your common sense tell you that?

MUELLER: I understand what you’re saying. I take your point.

ELLISON: Also, you know, in the Muslim community, America has a great Muslim community, several million people. And the post-9/11 world, there’s been greater attention on this community. I’m sure you wouldn’t dispute that.

My question is, how important are outreach efforts in the Muslim community, given that the overwhelming number of Muslims condemn, are opposed to terrorism, or would be happy to report on somebody who was committing, plotting terrorism? How important are outreach efforts into the Muslim community for the FBI? [more]

Please click here to read the transcript of the whole exchange between Congressman Ellison and FBI Director Mueller.

April 29, 2008

APAI PhD SCHOLARSHIP IN ISLAMIC FINANCE

Scholarship Description

One PhD scholarship is available to fund a PhD topic in the area of Islamic banking and finance. Students are welcome to put forward a brief proposal for any topic within that broad area in relation to finance. Research Field: Islamic Banking and Finance. Application method: Initially via email.

Study Subject: Finance
Provided By: Monash University
To be undertaken at: Monash University.
Level: Post Graduate Research

Availability
This scholarship is offered once only to one person.

Payment Information
The value of this scholarship is AUD25118 (per annum). This award is to be used for fees. This scholarship is paid fortnightly for the period of 3 years.

Research Information
This scholarship is for one of the following fields of research: ECONOMICS or Other economics. It is required that your study starts no earlier than January 1, 2008 and no later
than December 31, 2010.

Eligibility
This scholarship is for study in Australia for those who have achieved Honours 1 or equivalent, or Masters or equivalent. Only citizens of Australia or New Zealand or permanent resident over 1 year can apply.

Application Details
To apply for this scholarship you must apply direct to faculty. Terms and conditions are subject to change. Always confirm details with scholarship provider before applying.

Main Contact
Michael Skully (Professor of Banking)
Monash University
Phone: +61 3 9903 2407
Fax: +61 3 9903 1443
Email: michael.skully@buseco.monash.edu.au
Address:
Department of Accounting & Finance
Monash University
Caulfield campus
Vic, Australia
3145

April 28, 2008

Battle over an Islamic School in New York City: Information and Misinformation about the Khalil Gibran School

The New York Times

Please click here to watch a video about the struggles of the Khalil Gibran School.

Critics Cost Muslim Educator Her Dream School

Debbie Almontaser dreamed of starting a public school like no other in New York City. Children of Arab descent would join students of other ethnicities, learning Arabic together. By graduation, they would be fluent in the language and groomed for the country’s elite colleges. They would be ready, in Ms. Almontaser’s words, to become “ambassadors of peace and hope.”

Things have not gone according to plan. Only one-fifth of the 60 students at the Khalil Gibran International Academy are Arab-American. Since the school opened in Brooklyn last fall, children have been suspended for carrying weapons, repeatedly gotten into fights and taunted an Arabic teacher by calling her a “terrorist,” staff members and students said in interviews.

The academy’s troubles reach well beyond its cramped corridors in Boerum Hill. The school’s creation provoked a controversy so incendiary that Ms. Almontaser stepped down as the founding principal just weeks before classes began last September. Ms. Almontaser, a teacher by training and an activist who had carefully built ties with Christians and Jews, said she was forced to resign by the mayor’s office following a campaign that pitted her against a chorus of critics who claimed she had a militant Islamic agenda.

In newspaper articles and Internet postings, on television and talk radio, Ms. Almontaser was branded a “radical,” a “jihadist” and a “9/11 denier.” She stood accused of harboring unpatriotic leanings and of secretly planning to proselytize her students. Despite Ms. Almontaser’s longstanding reputation as a Muslim moderate, her critics quickly succeeded in recasting her image.

The conflict tapped into a well of post-9/11 anxieties. But Ms. Almontaser’s downfall was not merely the result of a spontaneous outcry by concerned parents and neighborhood activists. It was also the work of a growing and organized movement to stop Muslim citizens who are seeking an expanded role in American public life. The fight against the school, participants in the effort say, was only an early skirmish in a broader, national struggle.

It’s a battle that’s really just begun,” said Daniel Pipes, who directs a conservative research group, the Middle East Forum, and helped lead the charge against Ms. Almontaser and the school. [more]

Please click here to read the article about Ms. Almontaser.

April 28, 2008

Webcam of the Kaaba in Makkah

Please click here to watch the people doing Tawaf around the Kaaba in Makkah.

Presidency of the Two Holy Mosques Starts Website

Courtesy P.K. Abdul Ghafour, Arab News

JEDDAH, 22 April 2008 — The Presidency of the Two Holy Mosques has launched a website that allows people all over the world to watch prayers and sermons at the two mosques. It also offers access to 45,000 recordings of recitation of the Qur’an and Islamic lectures.

The website (http://www.gph.gov.sa) provides information about the presidency and its activities. It also contains links to the Agency for the Prophet’s Mosques Affairs, libraries of the two mosques, the Institute of the Haram Mosque and the Kaaba Kiswa Factory in Makkah.

The presidency is now working on the second phase of the project, which will include e-education services. Indices of rare books and calligraphic writings available in the two libraries will serve as a useful reference for researchers. “Services in English and other major languages will be available during the second phase,” said an official source.

The website contains information about how to perform Haj and Umrah, speeches in Arabic, Urdu and English, and prayer times in Makkah and Madinah, recitations of the Qur’an by the imams of the two holy mosques and their Friday sermons and books published by the presidency.

The website will also have radio programs in Arabic, Bahasa Indonesia and Urdu in addition to the programs of Radio Qur’an. “People can also access translations of the Qur’an in different languages,” the source said. The e-library contains pictures of the two holy mosques.

April 28, 2008

Interview of Imran Khan + Gallup Poll on Pakistan’s New Government

Please click here to watch this interview. Warning: the interviewer is not dressed Islamically.

Gallup Pakistan: Perceptions about the Newly Formed Government

Email: isb@gallup.com.pk; Web: www.gallup.com.pk

Released: April 14, 2008

PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE NEW PRIME MINISTER
Islamabad – Two thirds of the respondents (66%) in a national survey carried out by Gallup Pakistan gave very favourable or favourable view about the new Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani. Another 29% rated him as ‘fair’ indicating moderate approval. Only 7% rated him poorly.

Question: What is your personal view about the new Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani?

Percentage of Respondents
Very Favourable 22%
Favourable 42%
Fair 29%
Bad 5%
Very Bad 2%

Source: Gallup Pakistan Surveys, March-April, 2008

EXPECTATIONS ABOUT THE LONGEVITY OF NEW GOVERNMENT

In popular opinion the jury is still out about the expected longevity of the new parliament. Forty percent (40%) say there is a high chance of its completing its term, and a nearly equal number of 40% say the chances are moderate, while the remaining 18% believe the chances that the new parliament will complete its five year tenure without being dismissed are either slim or none at all. Obviously a section of public opinion is strongly influenced by what happened during the last twenty years when one after another popularly elected parliament was prematurely dismissed without completing its tenure.

PERCEPTION ABOUT THE DURABILITY OF PPP-PML-N ALLIANCE

Slightly under half of the population at 45%, believes that the two major coalition partners in the new government, namely PPP and PML-N will pull it together amicably. But a significant section of the population, 31%, believes that the coalition is likely to fall apart soon. The remaining 36% said they were unable to make a judgment in this matter.

ON THE DESIRABILITY OF PPP-MQM COALITION IN SINDH

Despite widespread sense of national reconciliation on several issues which previously divided the nation, views are still spilt on the desirability of PPP- MQM coalition in Sindh. More than one third, 37%, of the respondents in a nation-wide survey were favourable about the Reconciliation agreement between Asif Zardari and MQM, when he visited its Karachi headquarter. However almost an equal number of 35% looked upon it unfavourably. The remaining 28% said they were unable to give a view.
When asked specifically about the desirability of a coalition government of PPP and MQM in the Sindh province, views fell in the same pattern: 35% were favourable to forming a coalition government of the two, but 43% were opposed to it saying that ‘PPP should form a government on its own’. The remaining 22% did not give a view.

ON JUDICIARY

Apparently a variety of new political events have not changed popular views on the year long judicial crisis of Pakistan. When asked: Do you support or oppose the view that Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry should be reinstated as Chief Justice of Pakistan, 81% favoured his reinstatement while 17% opposed and 2% did not give a view. The spilt of opinion on this issue was nearly the same before the elections in November last year when Justice Chaudhry was dismissed.

ON PERVEZ MUSHARRAF

The latest public opinion survey shows the rather inflexible spilt of views on both the judicial crisis and the Presidency of General Pervez Musharraf. The respondents were asked: Now that the new parliament has been formed should President Pervez Musharraf continue as President, resign or be confronted with an impeachment. Given these three options, 26% favoured his continuation, 51% favoured resignation while 22% supported a possible move to remove the President through impeachment. The remaining 1% did not give a view. When compared with views on Musharraf’s continuation or otherwise, such spilt of opinion was roughly the same even prior to the National Assembly elections held in February 2008.

IS THE COUNTRY HEADING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION?

In contrast to the inflexibility of popular opinion on judicial crisis and Pervez Musharraf’s Presidency, views regarding the direction of the country have upsurged quite remarkably since the February elections. Before the elections, barely 15% believed the country was headed in the right direction. This figure rose to 40% soon after the elections and according to the latest Gallup Pakistan poll completed in early April, six weeks after the elections, 54% say the country is headed in the right direction. Despite the rising confidence in the way things are moving the doubters are also numerous. Thus 43% say the country is not headed in the right direction. The remaining 3% did not give a view.

April 23, 2008

World’s Youngest Professor is a 19 year old Woman

By Bob Considine
TODAYShow.com contributor
updated 7:42 a.m. PT, Wed., April. 23, 2008

Perhaps in Alia Sabur’s wildly advanced studies she came across a famous quote from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

“Knowing is not enough. We must apply,” the German writer once observed.

That could serve as explanation for what prompted the 19-year-old to become the youngest college professor in history.

Armed with prodigious wisdom, Sabur told TODAY’s Ann Curry on Wednesday that knowledge is power — especially when sharing it.

“I really enjoy teaching,” said Sabur. “It’s something where you can make a difference. It’s not just what you can do, but you can enable a lot of other people to make their changes.”

Sabur, from Northport, N.Y., has clearly been ahead of the learning curve since an early age.

She started talking and reading when she was just 8 months old. She had elementary school finished at age 5.

She made the jump to college at age 10. And by age 14, Sabur was earning a bachelor’s of science degree in applied mathematics summa cum laude from Stony Brook University — the youngest female in U.S. history to do so.

Her education continued at Drexel University, where she earned an M.S. and a Ph.D. in materials science and engineering.

With an unlimited future ahead of her, Sabur directed her first career choice to teaching. She was three days short of her 19th birthday in February when she was hired to become a professor at Konkuk University in Seoul, Korea.

This distinction made her the youngest college professor in history, according to the Guinness Book of World Records, beating the previous record held by Colin Maclaurin in 1717.

Maclaurin was a student of physicist Isaac Newton. Sabur said she is merely gravitating toward putting what she has learned to good use.

“I really feel I can help a lot of people,” she said.

At Konkuk University, Sabur said she will take part in classroom instruction, but will also focus on research into developing nanotubes for use as cellular probes that could help aid in cures for diseases.

Although she doesn’t start until next month, Sabur has taken up teaching math and physics courses at Southern University in New Orleans, which is still struggling from the devastation left in Hurricane Katrina’s wake in 2005. [more]

Please click here to read the whole article and watch a video from MSNBC.

April 23, 2008

Ethics Controversy: Union Carbide and the Bhopal Tragedy

Al Jazeera examines the devastating events of Bhopal, India in 1984, when a cloud of poisonous gas released over the city killed thousands in the world’s worst industrial disaster. More than 2 decades later, a whole city still suffers. However, Dow Jones, the new owner of Union Carbide, has attempted to reject all liability for the disaster since it was before they purchased this company.

Part 1

Part 2

April 21, 2008

‘Islamic’ schools that force African children to beg are behaving unislamically

Note from Rafik Beekun:

Islam emphasizes honest work in a halal job at all times over begging. The behavior of the “Islamic” school instructors who force children to beg for any reason, least of all to fill their own pockets, is absolutely against the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (s). Indeed, earning money through a halal trade is vastly preferred over begging. This principle is emphasized in the following hadith (narrated by Anas ibn Malik, in Abu Dawud, hadith no. 1637):

A man of the Ansar came to the Prophet (peace be upon him) and begged from him. He (the Prophet) asked, “Have you nothing in your house?” He replied, “Yes, a piece of cloth, a part of which we wear and a part of which we spread (on the ground), and a wooden bowl from which we drink water.” He said, “Bring them to me.” He then brought these articles to him and he (the Prophet) took them in his hands and asked, “Who will buy these?” A man said, “I shall buy them for one dirham.” He said twice or thrice, “Who will offer more than one dirham?” A man said, “I shall buy them for two dirhams.”

He gave these to him and took the two dirhams and, giving them to the Ansari, he said, “Buy food with one of them and hand it to your family, and buy an ax and bring it to me.” He then brought it to him. The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) fixed a handle on it with his own hands and said, “Go, gather firewood and sell it, and do not let me see you for a fortnight.” The man went away and gathered firewood and sold it. When he had earned ten dirhams, he came to him and bought a garment with some of them and food with the others.

The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) then said, “This is better for you than that begging should come as a spot on your face on the Day of Judgment. Begging is right only for three people: one who is in grinding poverty, one who is seriously in debt, or one who is responsible for compensation and finds it difficult to pay.”

DAKAR, Senegal (AP and CNN) — On the day he decided to run away, 9-year-old Coli awoke on a filthy mat.

Religious students forced to beg for their Quranic teacher ask for change in Dakar, Senegal, in August 2007.

Like a pup, he lay curled against the cold, pressed between dozens of other children sleeping head-to-toe on the concrete floor. His T-shirt was damp with the dew that seeped through the thin walls. The older boys had yanked away the square of cloth he used to protect himself from the draft. He shivered.

It was still dark as he set out for the mouth of a freeway with the other boys, a tribe of 7-, 8- and 9-year-old beggars.

Coli padded barefoot between the stopped cars, his head reaching only halfway up the windows. His scrawny body disappeared under a ragged T-shirt that grazed his knees. He held up an empty tomato paste can as his begging bowl.

There are 1.2 million Colis in the world today, children trafficked to work for the benefit of others. Those who lure them into servitude make $15 billion annually, according to the International Labor Organization.

It’s big business in Senegal. In the capital of Dakar alone, at least 7,600 child beggars work the streets, according to a study released in February by the ILO, the United Nations Children’s Fund and the World Bank. The children collect an average of 300 African francs a day, just 72 cents, reaping their keepers $2 million a year.

Most of the boys — 90 percent, the study found — are sent out to beg under the cover of Islam, placing the problem at the complicated intersection of greed and tradition. For among the cruelest facts of Coli’s life is that he was not stolen from his family. He was brought to Dakar with their blessing to learn Islam’s holy book.

In the name of religion, Coli spent two hours a day memorizing verses from the Quran and over nine hours begging to pad the pockets of the man he called his teacher.

It was getting dark. Coli had less than half the 72 cents he was told to bring back. He was afraid. He knew what happened to children who failed to meet their daily quotas.

They were stripped and doused in cold water. The older boys picked them up like hammocks by their ankles and wrists. Then the teacher whipped them with an electrical cord until the cord ate their skin.

Coli’s head hurt with hunger. He could already feel the slice of the wire on his back.

He slipped away, losing himself in a tide of honking cars. He had 20 cents in his tomato can.


Video: Can the Practice of Talibe be stopped?

Please click here to view a video on the practice of Islamic school children (’Talibe’) being forced to beg.


Three years ago, a man wearing a skullcap came to Coli’s village in the neighboring country of Guinea-Bissau and asked for him.

Coli’s parents immediately addressed the man as “Serigne,” a term of respect for Muslim leaders on Africa’s western coast. Many poor villagers believe that giving a Muslim holy man a child to educate will gain an entire family entrance to paradise.

Since the 11th century, families have sent their sons to study at the Quranic schools that flourished on Africa’s western seaboard with the rise of Islam. It is forbidden to charge for an Islamic education, so the students, known as talibe, studied for free with their marabouts, or spiritual teachers. In return, the children worked in the marabout’s fields.

The droughts of the late 1970s and ’80s forced many schools to move to cities, where their income began to revolve around begging. Today, children continue to flock to the cities, as food and work in villages run short.

Not all Quranic boarding schools force their students to beg. But for the most part, what was once an esteemed form of education has degenerated into child trafficking. Nowadays, Quranic instructors net as many children as they can to increase their daily take.

“If you do the math, you’ll find that these people are earning more than a government functionary,” said Souleymane Bachir Diagne, an Islamic scholar at Columbia University. “It’s why the phenomenon is so hard to eradicate.”

Please click here to read the remainder of this article entitled “Boy flees Islamic school that forces African children to beg” from AP and CNN .

Other articles of interest:

1. In Senegal, UNICEF and partners work to end the practice of child begging.

April 20, 2008

Breaking the Silence in Israel: Participant Testimonials

Burning Conscience: Israeli Soldiers Speak Out

Participant Testimonial: David

Participant Testimonial: Erika

Participant Testimonial: Joe

April 19, 2008

Our Reign of Terror: Confessions of Israeli Soldiers

By Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem,
The Observer, U.K.
Saturday, 19 April 2008

The dark-haired 22-year-old in black T-shirt, blue jeans and red Crocs is understandably hesitant as he sits at a picnic table in the incongruous setting of a beauty spot somewhere in Israel. We know his name and if we used it he would face a criminal investigation and a probable prison sentence.

The birds are singing as he describes in detail some of what he did and saw others do as an enlisted soldier in Hebron. And they are certainly criminal: the incidents in which Palestinian vehicles are stopped for no good reason, the windows smashed and the occupants beaten up for talking back - for saying, for example, they are on the way to hospital; the theft of tobacco from a Palestinian shopkeeper who is then beaten “to a pulp” when he complains; the throwing of stun grenades through the windows of mosques as people prayed. And worse.

The young man left the army only at the end of last year, and his decision to speak is part of a concerted effort to expose the moral price paid by young Israeli conscripts in what is probably the most problematic posting there is in the occupied territories. Not least because Hebron is the only Palestinian city whose centre is directly controlled by the military, 24/7, to protect the notably hardline Jewish settlers there. He says firmly that he now regrets what repeatedly took place during his tour of duty.

But his frequent, if nervous, grins and giggles occasionally show just a hint of the bravado he might have displayed if boasting of his exploits to his mates in a bar. Repeatedly he turns to the older former soldier who has persuaded him to speak to us, and says as if seeking reassurance: “You know how it is in Hebron.”

The older ex-soldier is Yehuda Shaul, who does indeed “know how it is in Hebron”, having served in the city in a combat unit at the peak of the intifada, and is a founder of Shovrim Shtika, or Breaking the Silence, which will publish tomorrow the disturbing testimonies of 39 Israelis - including this young man - who served in the army in Hebron between 2005 and 2007. They cover a range of experiences, from anger and powerlessness in the face of often violent abuse of Arabs by hardline Jewish settlers, through petty harassment by soldiers, to soldiers beating up Palestinian residents without provocation, looting homes and shops, and opening fire on unarmed demonstrators.

The maltreatment of civilians under occupation is common to many armies in the world - including Britain’s, from Northern Ireland to Iraq.

But, paradoxically, few if any countries apart from Israel have an NGO like Breaking the Silence, which seeks - through the experiences of the soldiers themselves - as its website puts it “to force Israeli society to address the reality which it created” in the occupied territories.

The Israeli public was given an unflattering glimpse of military life in Hebron this year when a young lieutenant in the Kfir Brigade called Yaakov Gigi was given a 15-month jail sentence for taking five soldiers with him to hijack a Palestinian taxi, conduct what the Israeli media called a “rampage”
in which one of the soldiers shot and wounded a Palestinian civilian who just happened to be in the wrong place, and then tried to lie his way out of it.

In a confessional interview with the Israeli Channel Two investigative programme Uvda, Gigi, who had previously been in many ways a model soldier, talked of “losing the human condition” in Hebron. Asked what he meant, he replied: “To lose the human condition is to become an animal.” [more]

Please click here to read the whole article.

Jewish Voice for Peace Demonstrates Against Terror by Israel

April 16, 2008

US Presidential Candidate John McCain and Corruption

McCain and Keating

McCain Flip Flops on Ethics Reform

McCain: Corruption in Politics

April 14, 2008

A Message of Hope: A Dying Professor’s Last Lecture

Many who are facing a dire situation at work or a major illness give up though as Muslims, Allah reminds us in surah 12, verse 87 that, “Truly no one despairs of Allah’s Soothing Mercy, except those who have no faith.”

Carnegie Mellon Professor Randy Pausch, who is dying from pancreatic cancer, gave his last lecture at the university Sept. 18, 2007, before a packed McConomy Auditorium.

His last lecture video clip has been viewed by over 2 million people, has inspired and has given hope to many of us. 

April 11, 2008

Poll Finds Iranians Favor Direct Talks with US on Shared Issues

 

Poll Finds Diminished Perception of US Threat,

General Thawing of Hostility 

 

For Release: 12:01 EDT April 7, 2008

Contact: Steven Kull, director, WorldPublicOpinion.org (202) 232-7500

 

College Park, MD—A new poll finds that although Iranians continue to view the United States negatively, they strongly support steps to improve US-Iran relations including direct talks on issues, greater access for each others’ journalists, increased trade and more cultural, educational and athletic exchanges. 

 

While majorities of Iranians think the United States threatens Iran and is hostile to Islam, these numbers have diminished over the past year.  A growing number—now two out of three—believe it is possible for Islam and the West to find common ground. 

 

“It appears that as the sense of threat has subsided, there has been some thawing of Iranian hostility and a greater readiness to enter into closer relations with the United States,” said Steven Kull, director of WorldPublicOpinion.org which conducted the poll in partnership with Search for Common Ground. . 

 

The poll also probed Iranian views on nuclear issues. Six in ten believe that nuclear weapons are contrary to Islam, but four out of five insist Iran should have the capacity to produce nuclear fuel for energy.  

 

A nationwide random sample of 710 Iranians was surveyed from January 13 to February 9. Parallel questions were asked to an American sample as part of a larger study comparing American and Iranian views.

 

Iranians support a number of measures for building closer relations between Iran and the United States:

 

  • 57 percent favor “direct talks on issues of mutual concern,” between the Iranian and American governments, while 69 percent favor talks “to stabilize the situation in Iraq,”
  • 64 percent favor greater US-Iran trade 
  • 70 percent favor “providing more access for each others’ journalists”.
  • 63 percent would like to see “greater cultural, educational, and sporting exchanges”
  • 71 percent favor having “more Americans and Iranians visit each others’ countries as tourists”

 

This support is especially striking given the widespread perception that the United States is hostile to both Iran and Islam.  Most Iranians (84%) assume that a goal of US policy is to weaken and divide the Islamic world.  About two in three (64%) also think the United States purposely seeks “to humiliate the Islamic world.”  Fifty-five percent view US bases in the Middle East as a threat to Iran.

 

Nonetheless, there has been some lessening of the sense of threat and an easing of hostile attitudes toward the United States as compared to WorldPublicOpinion.org polling in Iran in late 2006.

 

The percentage viewing US bases in the Middle East as a threat to Iran has dropped 18 points from 73 to 55 percent.  Those who think it is likely that the United States will strike Iran’s nuclear facilities in the near future has dropped from 48 to 34 percent.

 

While 69 percent of Iranians say they have an unfavorable view of the United States, this number is down from 76 percent.  More significant, the percentage saying that they have a “very unfavorable” view dropped 14 points from 65 to 51 percent.

 

A slight majority of Iranians (51%) now express a positive view of the American people.    Those with an unfavorable view have declined 12 points from 49 to 37 percent.

 

A growing majority believe that it is possible for “Muslim and Western cultures” to “find common ground,” rising from 58 to 64 percent, while those saying that “violent conflict between them is inevitable” has dropped from 25 to just 12 percent.

 

 “This diminished sense of threat may be due to the release of the US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) which concluded Iran is not trying to develop nuclear weapons” said Kull. “Iranians seem to interpret this as a sign that the US is less likely to attack Iran.” The 55 percent of Iranians who said they knew about the NIE felt less threatened by the United States than those who did not.

 

Iranians have a nuanced view of their country’s nuclear program.  Fifty-eight percent believe that producing nuclear weapons is contrary to Islam, while only 23 percent say that Islam does not prohibit the production of nuclear weapons.

 

But 81 percent say that it is “very important” for “Iran to have a full-fuel-cycle nuclear program” which would give Iran the capacity to produce nuclear fuel for energy production (and, with higher levels of enrichment, to produce nuclear weapons).  

 

At the same time 58 percent say that Iran should be willing to accept an agreement with the UN Security Council that would allow Iran to have a full fuel cycle nuclear program in return for giving the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) “permanent and full access throughout Iran to ensure that its nuclear program is limited to energy production” and is not producing nuclear weapons.

 

WorldPublicOpinion.org, an international research project managed by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland. 

 

Search for Common Ground has worked for over 10 years in Iran and the United States on improving US-Iran relations.

 

For more information about this poll, its methodology, and other findings, please visit: www.WorldPublicOpinion.org

 

To download the whole report, please click here.

April 11, 2008

Oil: The Umbilical Cord Between Israel and Tehran

Richard Silverstein, The Guardian, UK

If you’ve ever wondered about the definition of hypocrisy you’ll find the answer right here.

Last month the Swiss foreign minister visited Iran and, together with President Ahmadinejad, attended the signing of a multi-billion euro contract for Iran to supply Switzerland with large amounts of natural gas over the next 25 years.

The US State Department immediately condemned the deal and said it would be investigating whether it breached the Iran Sanctions Act. Israel complained too, describing the Swiss minister’s visit to Tehran as an “act unfriendly to Israel”. Various Jewish groups also joined in the protests, including the World Jewish Congress.

This righteous indignation was entirely predictable but more than a little odd nevertheless. On March 30, the Swiss newspaper Sonntag retaliated with the revelation that Israel, supposedly observing an ironclad boycott of all things Iranian, has been buying Iranian oil for years.

The story is in German but Israeli journalist Shraga Elam has provided me with a translation which I’ll quote from here.

Israel imports Iranian oil on a large scale even though contacts with Iran and purchasing of its products are officially boycotted by Israel. Israel gets around the boycott by having the oil delivered via Europe. A reliable Israeli energy newsletter, EnergiaNews, reported this last week [March 18] …

“EnergiaNews got the information about the Iran trade from sources with ties to the management of Israeli Oil Refineries Ltd … According to EnergiaNews the Iranian oil is liked in Israel because its quality is better than other crude oils. [more]

Please click here to read the remainder of this column

April 11, 2008

Intimidation and censorship are no answer to the inflammatory film “Fitna”

A Dutch politician’s alarmist anti-Islam polemic needs to be taken apart and calmly answered

Timothy Garton Ash, The Guardian, Thursday April 10 2008

At the time of this writing, the dissemination on the worldwide web of the deliberately provocative anti-Islam film Fitna, made by the Dutch populist MP Geert Wilders, has not provoked violent protest on the scale of the Rushdie affair or the Danish cartoons. If things remain this way, that is progress of a kind.

In the meantime, three questions need to be asked about the film, which anyone can find by googling “wilders” and “fitna”. The first is “Should Mr Wilders be murdered for making it?” That’s what some demonstrators outside the Dutch embassy in Indonesia called for, waving banners saying “Kill Geert Wilders”. Theirs is an attitude that the British writer Douglas Murray has sharply characterised as “say my religion is peaceful or I will kill you”. More seriously, even before the movie was released, al-Qaida issued a fatwa calling Muslims everywhere to assassinate Wilders, thus further increasing the threat to a man who is already under 24-hour protection.

Now, that Wilders should not be murdered for making a film may seem so obvious that it hardly needs saying. But it does need saying, again and again; in truth, it’s the first thing that needs to be said. For one of the most deeply corrosive realities of our time is that not just one but many people across the world are living under death threats, in hiding or with round-the-clock security, simply because they have said, drawn or done something that is alleged to “insult Islam”.

Too many Dutch and international leaders have leapt to deplore Wilders’ film without first excoriating those who threaten him with death. Particularly egregious is a statement by the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, which, in explicitly condemning the film (but not the death threats), actually says “the right of free expression is not at stake here”. That’s a truly idiotic claim. Mr Ban has no right to make it on our behalf.

The second question is whether Fitna should be banned by law, as the ambassadors of 26 Islamic countries have recently urged the Dutch government to do. Unlike the murder issue, I accept that this is a matter for legitimate debate in a democracy, but my answer remains an unequivocal “no”. The film is inflammatory but not, I think, across the line to incitement - and so far, the Dutch justice ministry seems to agree. Wilders’ own position here is ludicrously self-contradictory. Last year, he called for the Qur’an to be banned “like Mein Kampf”. So he wants the holy book of 1.4 billion people to be banned, but his own film to be seen by everyone. That’s his idea of free speech. Who does he think he is? The true prophet? [more]

Please click here to read the remainder of this article.

April 8, 2008

Entrapment of Muslims by the Law

Is Big Brother at your mosque?

By ABDUSSALAM MOHAMED, Senior Staff Writer

LOS ANGELES – On the first Friday of each month, Mohammed Elsisy, an Egyptian-born software engineer, usually drives from his home in Irvine, Calif., to the King Fahad mosque in Culver City, Calif., to deliver the khutba, or sermon.

Elsisy thought the first Friday of this past June would be no different.

But little did he know something totally unexpected was about to happen that would make this particular Friday the most memorable for years to come.

Elsisy had two passengers in his car at the time.

In the back seat sat Ahmed Niazi, 33, a language teacher and a friend, while in the passenger seat sat a man who converted to Islam almost a year ago.

The man was 44-year-old Craig Monteilh, but he went by the name “Farouk Aziz.”

“Monteilh started talking about the Iraq war,” Niazi said. “He went off on a rant against U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.”

But then, out of the blue, Monteilh said something that sent chills down the spines of his companions.

He asked Elsisy and Niazi if they knew of an “operation” he could be part of.

Pin-drop silence followed. Elsisy’s eyes bounced over to the rearview mirror and traded a horrified glance with Niazi.

“Blood froze up in our veins,” Elsisy recalls.

Please click here to read the remainder of the article.

The Lodhi entrapment case

The Lodhi entrapment case referred to in the above article is discussed in the video clips below:

The Admissibility of Coerced Confessions in the Lodhi Case

Additional Articles Regarding U.S. Muslims and the FBI

1. FBI Taps Cell Phone Microphones as Eavesdropping Tool.

2. Report: FBI Has Repeatedly Misused the Patriot Act.

3. Illegal Undercover FBI Sales Sting Fails.

Important Resource Booklet for Muslims when Approached by Law Enforcement

1. Please click here to read CAIR’s Know your rights booklet, especially the section regarding what you should do when approached by Law Enforcement.

April 8, 2008

An Interfaith View: Islamophobia and Racism

By Lawrence Swaim

In a much-anticipated speech about his Mormon faith, Mitt Romney had a perfect opportunity to illuminate the complexities of politics and religious liberty. Instead, he used the opportunity to plead for evangelical votes, signaling that he would do nothing to stop the Religious Right from using government to promote its agenda. This ignored the peculiar role of secularism in America — namely, that only secular government can guarantee religious liberty for religious minorities. In any case, Iowa’s evangelicals didn’t buy it, voting overwhelmingly for the down-home populism of Mike Huckabee.
Meanwhile, there are two libelous chain e-mails about Barack Obama making the rounds. The first suggests that he attends a Christian church that bars white worshippers. The second claims that he is a “sleeper” Muslim agent assigned to destroy America from within. Annenburg Political Fact Check, a project of the Annenburg Public Policy Center, calls both e-mails “appeals to bigotry and fear” that are “sliming Obama.”

The first e-mail maintains that Obama is “possibly a covert worshiper of the Muslim faith, even today.” It suggests that Obama’s church, Trinity United Church of Christ, won’t allow whites to join or attend. This is disputed by Martin E. Marty, a white theologian at the University of Chicago, who in April 2007 rebutted similar smears by Fox News commentators. “My wife and I on occasion attend,” he said, “and like all other non-blacks, [we] are enthusiastically welcomed.”

The second e-mail amps up the Islamophobia to Wagnerian heights. It states that Obama “takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim,” was enrolled in a “Wahabi” school in Indonesia and refuses to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, claiming that “while others place their hands over their hearts, Obama turns his back to the flag and slouches.” All bunk, the APFC says.

Some of the smears originated a year ago in Insight Magazine, owned by the same company that owns the The Washington Times. Last month, YNET news reported that Hebrew versions of the e-mails are circulating in Israel, suggesting that the campaign is more than just an afterthought of rogue activists. On Jan. 15, leaders of nine major U.S. Jewish organizations released an open letter denouncing the “hateful e-mails.”

There is a subliminal message in the campaign to slime Barack Obama. It is not true that he is a Muslim — but the e-mails also imply that American Muslims are inherently subversive. [more]

Please read the remainder of this article from Southern California Infocus newspaper.

Lawrence Swaim is the Executive Director of the Interfaith Freedom Foundation. He taught for eight years at Pacific Union College, and his academic specialties are American Studies and American literature. His column addresses current affairs from an American Christian and Interfaith perspective.

April 7, 2008

Christians, Jews and Muslims Working Together in Uganda

I found this video clip on Mohammad Latiff’s blog, and liked it so much that I am reposting it here. It is a positive and heart-warming video, and speaks to the inherent good in each one of us. Thank you Br. Mohammad.

April 6, 2008

An American Jew asks, “Where is the ‘Promised Land’?”

Jews Protest Against Zionism

Independence is my happiness, and I view things as they are, without regard to place or person; my country is the world, and my religion is to do good.” - Thomas Paine.

The American principles of freedom disdain the notion of a religious state. Has it not always been the duty of Americans to guarantee, as well as possess, the right of religious choice, so that every individual feels equal under law, regardless of religion? I imagine that the Jews of the United States would be among the first to protest if America wished to be called a “Christian State,” and replace the fifty stars of the flag with fifty crosses. It seems ironically unconscionable that the most state-persecuted religious group ever, the Jews, should want